chito

why did a judge refuse the bench?

Answered by Chito · asked 3 times

A judge, Justice Fuyal, refused to sit on the constitutional bench due to concerns about the arbitrary formation of the bench by Chief Justice Sharma. This refusal was part of a boycott by Justice Fuyal and others, who raised issues about impartiality and transparency in how the constitutional bench was formed. The situation has also drawn criticism from the Nepal Bar Association, which protested against the opaque practices in the bench's formation. This controversy highlights ongoing dissent among Supreme Court judges regarding seniority, inclusivity, and transparency in judicial appointments and bench formations.

Sources

  1. Judges boycott constitutional bench over impartiality issues
    Online Khabar
  2. Bar protests Supreme Court's opaque constitutional bench formation
    Setopati
  3. Justice Fuyal blocks constitutional bench over arbitrary formation
    Online Khabar
  4. Four judges recommended amid dissent on seniority and inclusivity
    Setopati
  5. Two judges dissent over Supreme Court judge recommendations
    Nagarik News

Ask your own question

Chito answers across all eight Nepali outlets, in Nepali or English.

Ask in Nepali — the Chito appGet it