why did a judge refuse the bench?
A judge, Justice Fuyal, refused to sit on the constitutional bench due to concerns about the arbitrary formation of the bench by Chief Justice Sharma. This refusal was part of a boycott by Justice Fuyal and others, who raised issues about impartiality and transparency in how the constitutional bench was formed. The situation has also drawn criticism from the Nepal Bar Association, which protested against the opaque practices in the bench's formation. This controversy highlights ongoing dissent among Supreme Court judges regarding seniority, inclusivity, and transparency in judicial appointments and bench formations.
Sources
- Judges boycott constitutional bench over impartiality issuesOnline Khabar
- Bar protests Supreme Court's opaque constitutional bench formationSetopati
- Justice Fuyal blocks constitutional bench over arbitrary formationOnline Khabar
- Four judges recommended amid dissent on seniority and inclusivitySetopati
- Two judges dissent over Supreme Court judge recommendationsNagarik News
Ask your own question
Chito answers across all eight Nepali outlets, in Nepali or English.