why did supreme court halt amendment rules?

The Supreme Court halted the implementation of two controversial parliamentary rules related to constitutional amendments. These rules, passed solely by the RASWAPA (House of Representatives), bypassed the usual requirement of a separate two-thirds approval for constitutional amendments. The court issued an interim order to suspend these rules until a final verdict is reached, effectively stopping their immediate enforcement. This move aims to ensure that constitutional amendment procedures adhere to the proper legal framework and prevent any unilateral changes without broader consensus.